Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gateways.json #397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2023
Merged

Update gateways.json #397

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2023

Conversation

itsKV
Copy link
Contributor

@itsKV itsKV commented Apr 30, 2023

Removing ipfs.litnet.work gateway. Can't manage such loads of phishing reports and domain takedown warnings.

Removing ipfs.litnet.work gateway. Can't manage such loads of phishing reports and domain takedown warnings.
@itsKV itsKV requested a review from a team as a code owner April 30, 2023 04:16
@whizzzkid
Copy link
Contributor

@itsKV this is a valid frustration and understandable. There has been progress on the blocking front that can be read here: https://blog.ipfs.tech/2023-content-blocking-for-the-ipfs-stack/

There is an alpha implementation available to pull in IPIP-298 which can reduce some headaches, You're always welcome to submit your gateway again if you feel the concerns have been resolved.

Thank you for hosting!

@whizzzkid whizzzkid merged commit 6f39bd3 into ipfs:master May 1, 2023
@itsKV
Copy link
Contributor Author

itsKV commented May 4, 2023

This is very optimistic hope for gateway providers. However, a web based and community driven blocking layer can be more manageable. Like AdGuard blocker where blocking service will be hosted at kubo level and denylist will be fetched from publicly managed and audited source (like denylist for AdGuard, but content will be cleartext CID)
🤞

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.2 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants